Buyer decision tool

Miami home-buying scorecard

Evaluate one property or compare two side by side through seven decisions: objective, microlocation, space, condition, total cost, potential and offer. The goal is not a flattering score; it is to expose what you know and what still requires verification.

01

A property should not be decided by one number.

Use the scorecard while screening or after a tour. Classify each area according to the evidence available, then note the question or professional needed to close the gap. The result prepares a better conversation; it does not replace the checks required for a specific property.

  1. 01

    Identify the property and its intended use.

  2. 02

    Classify each criterion without filling gaps with assumptions.

  3. 03

    Turn open items and material conditions into specific verifications.

  4. 04

    Compare different properties through the same structure every time.

Your initial reading

Your responses remain in this browser. This tool does not save or submit the data.

01 · Objective

Does the property solve the purchase you actually want to make?

  • Use and horizon
  • Non-negotiables
  • Acceptable level of intervention
Does the property solve the purchase you actually want to make?

02 · Microlocation

Does the immediate location work beyond the neighborhood name?

  • Immediate context
  • Access and daily routine
  • Probable demand and liquidity
Does the immediate location work beyond the neighborhood name?

03 · Space

Do layout, light and scale support how you intend to live or use the asset?

  • Circulation and usable area
  • Indoor–outdoor relationship
  • Privacy, light and proportion
Do layout, light and scale support how you intend to live or use the asset?

04 · Condition and documents

What is known and what must a specialist confirm?

  • Visible condition
  • Inspection and systems
  • Building, association, permits or title
What is known and what must a specialist confirm?

05 · Total cost

Does the decision remain coherent after acquisition, ownership and intervention costs?

  • Closing and financing
  • Insurance, taxes and association
  • Work, contingency and time
Does the decision remain coherent after acquisition, ownership and intervention costs?

06 · Potential and constraints

Does the imagined transformation have a reasonable path to verification?

  • Program and result
  • Probable complexity
  • Rules, permits and required team
Does the imagined transformation have a reasonable path to verification?

07 · Offer and exit

Do price and terms reflect the evidence, risk and your alternatives?

  • Comparables and competition
  • Contingencies and credits
  • Ability to walk away or change course
Do price and terms reflect the evidence, risk and your alternatives?

ACTIVO

Initial reading

The scorecard does not produce an automatic approval. It organizes what is favorable, what remains open and what may change the decision.

Aligned
0
Verify
0
Material condition
0
Unclassified
7

How to interpret the result

  1. 01

    A material condition does not automatically mean reject the property; it means verify and measure its consequence before offering.

  2. 02

    Many open items mean there is not yet enough evidence to compare price, risk and terms.

  3. 03

    Aligned items are useful only when they answer your objective and are supported by reliable information.

What this scorecard does—and does not do

It organizes preliminary observations and questions. It is not an appraisal, inspection, structural assessment, legal review, title analysis, permit confirmation or construction estimate. Applicable information should be verified with the appropriate professionals and authorities.

Review with Joaquin

If the property deserves to advance, let us identify what should be confirmed before you offer.

I can help compare the asset, organize the questions and connect the evidence to a purchase strategy through Conde Realty.

Request an initial review Read how to compare two properties